|
|
 | Fixture Details | |  | | |
Home | Return to Division Fixtures
| Report: | As requested by Matt. Every day is a lesson:
If the striker turns, refrains from hitting the ball, and appeals for a let:
It’s a LET if there was a reasonable fear of the ball striking the non-striker providing the striker could have made a good return.
It’s a NO LET if the non-striker was well clear and there was NO reasonable fear of striking that non-striker.
It’s a NO LET if the striker could NOT have made a good return.
Sometimes a player will want to avoid hitting a difficult shot and will quickly move into the corner to place the ball on that player’s other side—thus setting up an artificial turning situation—and then asks for a let. If the referee judges this to be a deliberate attempt to stop play rather than a legitimate attempt to play the ball, then a NO LET is the correct decision since this is considered a form of created interference. The intent here is to keep the game continuous as much as possible. Luckily, this is also a rare occurrence.
https://squashmagazine.com/2011/12/all-about-turning/ |
|---|
| Author: | CW |
|---|
| |  |  |  |
|
